Proposed grant reviewer and scoring workflow
Illustrative concept only. No working GrantDesk application, production connector, automated capability, agency customer, or security certification is deployed or independently verified.
An agency may explore a proposed reviewer workflow for one grant program. GrantDesk currently presents an illustrative sample screen, not a working scoring application or production agency system.
Agency staff define the review process
Reviewer assignments, scoring criteria, conflict rules, recordkeeping, and award approvals must be determined by the agency for its own program.
Scoring capability has not been built
No reviewer accounts, implemented scoring rubric, automated ranking, conflict detection, or live review application currently exists.
Possible future reviewer support
A separately approved pilot could consider how staff review application materials and document their reasoning. Any automation or AI-assisted summary would need explicit scoping and verification.
Human award decisions are mandatory
Authorized agency reviewers and staff retain scoring, eligibility, funding, and applicant communication decisions. No automated award approval is proposed.
Review the proposed technical discussion guide and confirm the agency's actual requirements before any implementation.
Common questions
Can the agency use its current rubric today?
No working GrantDesk reviewer application exists. Any rubric support would need separate implementation after agency approval.
Does GrantDesk currently provide AI-generated scoring?
No. No production AI feature or automated scoring capability is deployed, and funding decisions remain with agency staff.
Are conflict-of-interest controls already implemented?
No. Any agency-specific conflict controls, access restrictions, and audit records are proposed requirements only.
Discuss a separately scoped agency pilot
Review an illustrative sample workflow and decide whether one program warrants further evaluation.
Request a pilot walkthrough